The apparent propaganda surrounding the Osama Bin Laden Death hoax is increasing. As we reported already, the assassination of Osama Bin Laden is a hoax, and Alex Jones predicted the hoax back in 2002.  This post is a quick re-cap of the fake assassination of Osama Bin Laden being propagated by the Mainstream Media.

Official Story Changes Every Two to Three Days

The official story rivals the script of internationally acclaimed FPS(First-Person Shooter) video game Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, or a Jerry Bruckheimer-style fictional made for TV movie. Much like the Jessica Lynch “rescue” was scripted for public consumption, solely to elicit contrived patriotism and pro-war sentiment amongst the American people.

Navy SEALS stormed Osama Bin Laden’s Pakistan residence, courageously engaged in a firefight, and killed anything that moved. Osama Bin laden at one point used a woman as a body shield, Bin Laden’s wife and his son ,Khalid, was killed by the SEALS during the raid. The photos were described by many as having “historical significance,” forming a “captivating” record of Obama’s greatest success and being the “defining moment” of his Presidency. We were also told by the media that, “The leader of the free world saw the terror chief shot in the left eye.”

Then 48 hours later, the story changed, literally. White House press secretary Jay Carney told a completely different story compared to the original told Sunday evening. All of the Al Queda members present on the property miraculously was armed, there was no firefight, Osama was not armed and he did not hide behind a woman, his wife and son are still alive, etc. The White House said that Bin Laden had a weapon and tried to hide behind his wife like a coward. Now, the White House has admitted both claims were false. Every detail of the original story has been changed.Why should the story change? What’s so confusing Obama and other top White House brass saw the video in real time right?

There was a firefight and the al-Qaeda leader was “killed in that firefight,” John Brennan said. There was a woman who was used “to shield bin Laden from the incoming fire.” The woman killed in the raid was bin Laden’s wife, Brennan said: “She was positioned in a way that indicated that she was being used as a shield.”

And bin Laden was killed because he resisted capture. “If we had the opportunity to take him alive, we would have done that,” Brennan told reporters at the briefing.

“Looking at what bin Laden was doing hiding there while he’s putting other people out there to carry out attacks again just speaks to, I think, the nature of the individual he was,” Brennan said.

It wasn’t just Brennan, either. Politico’s Josh Gerstein reports:

At a Pentagon briefing earlier in the day, a senior defense official said bin Laden used a woman as a human shield so he could fire shots. “He was firing behind her,” the official said.In another background briefing early Monday morning, a senior administration official also said bin Laden put up a fight. “He did resist the assault force. And he was killed in a firefight,” the official said.

By end of day, that narrative — much like the narrative of Jessica Lynch’s heroism in 2003 — was being picked apart. Reported Politico:

“A different guy’s wife was killed,” a different official familiar with the briefing for TV reporters said Monday night. Bin Laden’s wife was “injured but not killed,” the official said.Another official familiar with the operation said it did not appear that any woman was used as a human shield, but that the woman killed and the one injured were hurt in the crossfire. The official said he believed Brennan had mixed up the episode involving bin Laden’s wife with another encounter elsewhere in the compound.

“Two women were shot here. It sounds like their fates were mixed up,” said the U.S. official. “This is hours old and the full facts are still being ascertained as those involved are debriefed.”

Whether bin Laden was armed when he was shot also was initially unclear:

…during a background, off-camera briefing for television reporters later Monday, a senior White House official said bin Laden was not armed when he was killed, apparently by the U.S. raid team.Another White House official familiar with the TV briefing confirmed the change to POLITICO, adding, “I’m not aware of him having a weapon.”

As for the claim that bin Laden was living in a mansion, as opposed to just a big house, all that’s needed to debunk that description is some pictures of the house. A Wall Street Journal reporter went to the scene and gave this eye-witness account, concluding there was nothing mansion-like about it:

The size and fortress-like nature of the compound stood out in the area, though many of the houses in Abbottabad, built by ex-servicemen and business people, also have high walls. Homes are separated by empty plots where people grow crops like potatoes and wheat. The top two floors of bin Laden’s three-story house are visible above the high perimeter walls. The house, built in 2005, appears run-down. Grass grows off a ledge below the roof. The outside walls are scarred with damp and mold. A hand-painted advertisement for Jamia Girls College, in Urdu and English, decorates one of the outside walls of the compound.

One of the awnings on an outdoor window hung down at an angle, perhaps after being damaged during the attack. Otherwise, the house stood intact, with few signs a major firefight only two days earlier.

There were no visible airconditioning units to keep residents cool through the Pakistan summer. At the back of the house was a small, private triangular garden with a towering fir tree, where bin Laden could have gotten air without being seen by outsiders.

White House spokesman Jay Carney at Tuesday’s briefing provided a fresh official “narrative” of the assault, noting “What is true is that we provided a great deal of information in great haste” yesterday “and obviously some of the information came in piece by piece and is being reviewed and updated.”

As the U.S. assault team entered the room where bin Laden was with his wife, she rushed the “assaulter” and was shot in the leg, Carney said. Bin Laden was also shot as he resisted the “assaulter.” He “was not armed” but “resistance does not require a firearm,” Carney said.

“It was a highly volatile firefight. He resisted. The U.S. personnel on the ground handled themselves with the utmost professionalism,” Carney said.

The special forces involved in the attack work under the aegis of the Joint Special Operations Command, which does not routinely provide accurate public information about its activities or “secret warriors,” according to National Journal’s Marc Ambinder. He reported Monday:

Several dozen JSOC operatives have died in Pakistan over the past several years. Their names are released by the Defense Department in the usual manner, but with a cover story — generally, they were killed in training accidents in eastern Afghanistan. That’s the code.

The new “narrative” laid out by Tuesday was written by the Department of Defense, Carney said.

Former top spymaster Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who worked under five different US Presidents, has been proven correct in his assertion that the photos were “Nonsense….total make-up, make believe,” and proof that Americans were being held captive to a “theater of the absurd”.

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts pointed out in the following excerpts:

“Carney blamed the changed story on “the fog of war.” But there was no firefight, so where did the “fog of war” come from? “

“What kind of incompetence does it require to senselessly and needlessly kill the most valuable intelligence asset on the planet?”

“According to the US government, the terrorist movements of the world operated through bin Laden, “the mastermind.” Thanks to a trigger-happy stupid SEAL, a bullet destroyed the most valuable terrorist information on the planet.”

“Another reason the story had to be abandoned is that if the event was captured on video, every news service in the world would be asking for the video, but if the event was orchestrated theater, there would be no video.”

“Many have noticed that Obama was facing re-election with poor approval ratings. Is anyone surprised that the New York Times/CBS Poll finds a strong rise in Obama’s poll numbers after the bin Laden raid? As the New York Times reported, “the glow of national pride” rose “above partisan politics, as support for the president rose significantly among both Republicans and independents. In all, 57 percent said they now approved of the president’s job performance, up from 46 percent.”

“In Washington-think, a 24% rise in approval rating justifies a staged event.”

Fake/Old Media Permitted As Evidence

The London Guardian, Sun, Daily Mail, and news corporations all over the Middle East used a doctored photo as proof Bin Laden was “doubled tapped” (shot once in the head, once in the chest).